Technology
Lawyer who used ChatGPT under fire for its 'bogus' citations
A lawyer suing the Colombian airline Avianca used ChatGPT to submit a brief full of previous cases made up by the AI software.
However, the opposing counsel pointed out the false cases in his brief and US District Judge Kevin Castel confirmed, “Six of the submitted cases appear to be bogus judicial decisions with bogus quotes and bogus internal citations.”
Steven A Schwartz had submitted an affidavit using OpenAI's chatbot for research and had verified the cases by just asking the bot if it was lying.
The bot had confirmed the cases but had failed to provide sources for verification besides two sites, Westlaw and LexisNexis.
The opposing counsel was quick to point out the made-up cases, most of which were unverified and another had wrong dates.
Schwartz said he was “unaware of the possibility that its content could be false.” He said he “greatly regrets having utilised generative artificial intelligence to supplement the legal research performed herein and will never do so in the future without absolute verification of its authenticity.”
The case highlights the absurdity of using AI chatbots for professional research without cross-checking or verifying the information.
-
Technology48s ago
The Career Paths of Hollywood’s Richest Actors
-
Technology6m ago
The Mars Sample Return mission has a shaky future, and NASA is calling on private companies for backup
-
Technology6m ago
IceCube researchers detect a rare type of energetic neutrino sent from powerful astronomical objects
-
Technology4h ago
China green-lights mass production of autonomous flying taxis — with commercial flights set for 2025
-
Technology4h ago
Live Science daily newsletter: Get amazing science every day
-
Technology12h ago
Senate Passes TikTok Bill to Force Chinese Parent Company to Sell or Face U.S. Ban
-
Technology18h ago
Jon Stewart Is Right About the Dangers of AI
-
Technology18h ago
How TIME and Statista Determined the World’s Top EdTech Companies of 2024