Science
Human ancestor 'Lucy' was hairless, new research suggests. Here's why that matters.
Fifty years ago, scientists discovered a nearly complete fossilized skull and hundreds of pieces of bone of a 3.2-million-year-old female specimen of the genus Australopithecus afarensis, often described as "the mother of us all." During a celebration following her discovery, she was named "Lucy," after the Beatles song "Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds."
Though Lucy has solved some evolutionary riddles, her appearance remains an ancestral secret.
Popular renderings dress her in thick, reddish-brown fur, with her face, hands, feet and breasts peeking out of denser thickets.
This hairy picture of Lucy, it turns out, might be wrong.
Technological advancements in genetic analysis suggest that Lucy may have been naked, or at least much more thinly veiled.
According to the coevolutionary tale of humans and their lice, our immediate ancestors lost most of their body fur 3 to 4 million years ago and did not don clothing until 83,000 to 170,000 years ago.
That means that for over 2.5 million years, early humans and their ancestors were simply naked.
-
Science2d ago
Inside Capitol Hill’s Latest UFO Hearings
-
Science2d ago
You Won’t Want to Miss the Leonid Meteor Shower. Here’s How and When You Can See It
-
Science2d ago
Here’s What Trump’s Win Means for NASA
-
Science6d ago
Why Risky Wildfire Zones Have Been Increasing Around the World
-
Science6d ago
It’s Time to Redefine What a Megafire Is in the Climate Change Era
-
Science1w ago
4 Astronauts Return to Earth After Being Delayed by Boeing’s Capsule Trouble and Hurricane Milton
-
Science1w ago
The Elegance and Awkwardness of NASA’s New Moon Suit, Designed by Axiom and Prada
-
Science1w ago
SpaceX Launches Its Mega Starship Rocket. This Time, Mechanical Arms Catch It at Landing