Technology
Musk’s X sues advertisers for boycotting platform.
Elon Musk’s social media platform X on Tuesday sued a global advertising alliance and several major companies, including Mars and CVS Health, accusing them of unlawfully conspiring to boycott the site and causing it to lose revenue.
X filed the lawsuit in federal court in Texas against the World Federation of Advertisers, Unilever and Danish renewable energy company Orsted, in addition to Mars and CVS Health.
The lawsuit said advertisers, acting through a World Federation of Advertisers initiative called Global Alliance for Responsible Media, collectively withheld “billions of dollars in advertising revenue” from X, previously known as Twitter.
It said they acted against their own economic self-interests in a conspiracy against the platform that violated US antitrust law.
The World Federation of Advertisers, Unilever, Mars, CVS Health and Orsted did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
In a statement on Tuesday about the lawsuit, X’s chief executive Linda Yaccarino said “people are hurt when the marketplace of ideas is constricted. No small group of people should monopolize what gets monetized.”
Ad revenue at X slumped for months after Musk bought the company in 2022. Some advertisers had been wary of ad spending under Musk amid questions and fears that their brands would appear next to harmful content that under prior owners might have been removed.
A US judge ruled on Monday that Google violated antitrust law, spending billions of dollars to create an illegal monopoly and become the world's default search engine.
The advertising group launched the responsible media initiative in 2019 to “help the industry address the challenge of illegal or harmful content on digital media platforms and its monetization via advertising.”
Christine Bartholomew, an antitrust expert and professor at University at Buffalo's law school told Reuters that lawsuits alleging unlawful boycotts can face a high bar.
X must show that there was an actual agreement to boycott joined by each advertiser, Bartholomew said. "Proving this requirement is no small hurdle" in cases where an agreement might be implicit, she said.
Even if the case succeeds, X cannot force companies to spend ad revenue on the platform, Bartholomew said.
The case was filed in the Northern District of Texas and assigned to US District Judge Reed O'Connor. The district has become a favored destination for conservatives suing to block Biden administration policies.
X said in its lawsuit that it has applied brand-safety standards that are comparable to those of its competitors and that “meet or exceed” measures specified by the Global Alliance for Responsible Media.
The lawsuit said X has become a “less effective competitor” in the sale of digital advertising.
X is seeking unspecified damages and a court order against any continued efforts to conspire to withhold ad dollars.
Video-sharing company Rumble on Tuesday filed a separate antitrust lawsuit against the World Federation of Advertisers.
-
Technology1h ago
Celestron NexStar 8SE now $240 cheaper off in latest price drop
-
Technology1h ago
1st-of-its-kind 'cooling chip' could prevent AI smartphones from overheating — with 1st devices launching in 2026
-
Technology8h ago
The mystic and the mathematician: What the towering 20th-century thinkers Simone and André Weil can teach today’s math educators
-
Technology12h ago
Quantum data beamed alongside 'classical data' in the same fiber-optic connection for the 1st time
-
Technology20h ago
Europe's Jupiter probe to stage daring lunar-Earth fly-by
-
Technology1d ago
Astronomers have warned against colonial practices in the space industry − a philosopher of science explains how the industry could explore other planets without exploiting them
-
Technology1d ago
Could we use volcanoes to make electricity?
-
Technology1d ago
These 'living computers' are made from human neurons — and you can rent one for $500 a month