F1 News
Newey’s F1 plans unchanged as he's set for trackside return in Japan
The legendary F1 designer has been an integral part of Red Bull’s recent success, working in close collaboration with technical director Pierre Wache and his team on the progress with its new RB20 car.
Although Newey does not work full-time on the F1 operation, with his chief technical officer role expanding to include other projects, he still devotes a lot of time to ensuring Red Bull hits its full potential at the race tracks.
Newey was present at the season-opening Bahrain and Saudi Arabian Grands Prix, but a scheduled absence from the next race in Australia is understood to have fuelled talk that he could be stepping back from some of his responsibilities.
There have even been rumours that Red Bull wants to move him exclusively on to its RB17 hypercar project.
It was suggested that this could have been because of concerns over F1’s budget cap limits and potential unease about the political situation at the top of the team amid the power battle for control of the grand prix outfit.
However, sources have indicated that any idea of Newey changing roles is wide of the mark. His role remains unchanged and, with work continuing on the RB20, he will return trackside as scheduled at the Japanese Grand Prix next month.
Adrian Newey, Red Bull Racing Chief Technical Officer
Photo by: Red Bull Content Pool
Newey has long been surrounded by speculation of a potential end to his F1 involvement, but remains as motivated as ever to continue delivering in the championship.
In fact, speaking earlier this year, he said that the only time he had ever considered stepping back was in 2014 when Red Bull was living through a huge disadvantage with its power unit.
“I joined Red Bull [to build a technical team],” he said. “It was a bit of a career risk, but I wanted to again be involved with the development of the team at the start.
“So, having been involved in the start and been involved with Christian and Helmut [Marko] in how we developed the team, then why would I want to walk away from that?
“The only time it came close was in 2014 and that was for completely different reasonings. It was very simply at that time we had a power unit which wasn’t performing, which happens of course. And there didn’t seem to be a huge desire from the manufacturer [Renault] at the very top level to put the investment in to turn that around.
“So, you’re then in a bit of a depressing position where, as we all know, to win championships you’ve got to have the three key factors of driver, chassis and engine – and if one of those is weak you won’t win…”
-
F1 News11h ago
Why forcing Red Bull to make a “bad choice” is Vasseur’s main F1 target
-
F1 News17h ago
Albon: Williams lack of F1 performance a "realisation" of task ahead
-
F1 News1d ago
Why it's time for F1 to hold its own "throwback" livery race
-
F1 News1d ago
F1 drivers call for review into "joke" penalty points system
-
F1 News1d ago
Ferrari confirms arrival of ex-Mercedes F1 men D'Ambrosio, Serra
-
F1 News1d ago
Why Ford feels Red Bull has ace up its sleeve with F1 2026 engine project
-
F1 News2d ago
Haas suing Steiner over alleged “Surviving to Drive” infringements
-
F1 News2d ago
Sauber to add 'important' Imola upgrades to cure F1 pitstop woes