Archaeology
Is Latin a dead language?
The Latin language used to be spoken all over the Roman Empire. But no country officially speaks it now, at least not in its classic form. So, did Latin really Peter out when the Roman Empire ceased to exist?
Rome used to be one of the largest empires in the world, but gradually Rome's sway over its colonies dwindled until it completely lost control. Despite this, Latin continued to be the lingua franca throughout much of Europe hundreds of years after that happened. The answer to the question of when Latin, ancient Rome's language, died is a complicated one. There's no date in the annals of History to mark the end of Latin as a spoken language, and some would argue that's because it never really died.
The Vatican may still deliver some masses in Latin, but virtually no one in Italy is using Latin on a day-to-day basis. Nevertheless, this doesn't equate to the death of Latin, said Tim Pulju, a senior lecturer in linguistics and classics at Dartmouth College in New Hampshire.
Related: Why did Rome fall?
"Latin didn't really stop being spoken," Pulju told Live Science. "It continued to be spoken natively by people in Italy, Gaul, Spain and elsewhere, but like all living languages, it changed over time."
Crucially, the alterations to Latin were particular to the many different regions of the old Roman Empire, and over time these differences grew to create entirely new but closely related languages. "They gradually added up over the centuries, so that eventually Latin developed into a variety of languages distinct from one another, and also distinct from classical Latin," Pulju said. Those new languages are what we now refer to as the Romance languages, which include French, Italian, Portuguese, Romanian and Spanish.
Such linguistic evolutions happen with every language. Take English, for example. "English has been spoken in England for over a millennium, but it has changed over time, as is obvious if you compare present-day English to Elizabethan English, as seen in Shakespeare," Pulju said. "Elizabethan English, from about four centuries ago, is still mostly comprehensible to us, but Chaucer's English, dating from the 14th century, is much less so. And the English of 'Beowulf,' from about the year 1000, is so different from modern English [it's] not comprehensible to us today." But no one would say English is a dead language — it simply changed very gradually over a long period of time.
-
Archaeology1m ago
Egypt’s Stυппiпg Archaeological Discovery: Alieп Symbols oп Aпcieпt Coiпs Spark Extraterrestrial Theories
-
Archaeology1m ago
2,800-year-old burial mound with sacrifices unearthed in Siberia is eerily similar to Scythian graves
-
Archaeology1m ago
Nabta Playa: A mysterious stone circle that may be the world's oldest astronomical observatory
-
Archaeology1m ago
Ancient DNA from South Africa rock shelter reveals the same human population stayed there for 9,000 years
-
Archaeology1m ago
'Extraordinary' burial of ancient Egyptian governor's daughter discovered in a coffin within another coffin
-
Archaeology1m ago
Grand tomb of Roman gladiator found in Turkey actually contains the remains of 12 other people
-
Archaeology1m ago
Neanderthals and modern humans interbred 'at the crossroads of human migrations' in Iran, study finds
-
Archaeology1m ago
Did Neanderthals wear clothes?