Archaeology
Is Latin a dead language?
The Latin language used to be spoken all over the Roman Empire. But no country officially speaks it now, at least not in its classic form. So, did Latin really Peter out when the Roman Empire ceased to exist?
Rome used to be one of the largest empires in the world, but gradually Rome's sway over its colonies dwindled until it completely lost control. Despite this, Latin continued to be the lingua franca throughout much of Europe hundreds of years after that happened. The answer to the question of when Latin, ancient Rome's language, died is a complicated one. There's no date in the annals of History to mark the end of Latin as a spoken language, and some would argue that's because it never really died.
The Vatican may still deliver some masses in Latin, but virtually no one in Italy is using Latin on a day-to-day basis. Nevertheless, this doesn't equate to the death of Latin, said Tim Pulju, a senior lecturer in linguistics and classics at Dartmouth College in New Hampshire.
Related: Why did Rome fall?
"Latin didn't really stop being spoken," Pulju told Live Science. "It continued to be spoken natively by people in Italy, Gaul, Spain and elsewhere, but like all living languages, it changed over time."
Crucially, the alterations to Latin were particular to the many different regions of the old Roman Empire, and over time these differences grew to create entirely new but closely related languages. "They gradually added up over the centuries, so that eventually Latin developed into a variety of languages distinct from one another, and also distinct from classical Latin," Pulju said. Those new languages are what we now refer to as the Romance languages, which include French, Italian, Portuguese, Romanian and Spanish.
Such linguistic evolutions happen with every language. Take English, for example. "English has been spoken in England for over a millennium, but it has changed over time, as is obvious if you compare present-day English to Elizabethan English, as seen in Shakespeare," Pulju said. "Elizabethan English, from about four centuries ago, is still mostly comprehensible to us, but Chaucer's English, dating from the 14th century, is much less so. And the English of 'Beowulf,' from about the year 1000, is so different from modern English [it's] not comprehensible to us today." But no one would say English is a dead language — it simply changed very gradually over a long period of time.
-
Archaeology5h ago
3,200-year-old ancient Egyptian barracks contains sword inscribed with 'Ramesses II'
-
Archaeology5h ago
Jade burial suit: 2,000-year-old 'immortality' armor worn by Chinese royalty
-
Archaeology1d ago
Ready for Tomorrow’s Battlefield? Iпtrodυciпg the гeⱱoɩᴜtіoпагу StrykerX.criss
-
Archaeology2d ago
How did people clean themselves before soap was invented?
-
Archaeology3d ago
4 silver Viking Age bracelets discovered 'untouched' on Norway mountainside after more than 1,000 years
-
Archaeology4d ago
2,300-year-old Celtic helmet discovered in Poland
-
Archaeology4d ago
The World Stυппed: Discover the Astoпishiпg Power of These Uпbelievable Aircraft Carriers.criss
-
Archaeology5d ago
What We Discovered With a Metal Detector: A Priceless Treasure.hanh