US News
E. Jean Carroll wins partial summary judgment in original 2019 defamation case against Trump
A federal judge in New York on Wednesday granted writer E. Jean Carroll's motion for partial summary judgment in her 2019 defamation case against former President Donald Trump.
Carroll, a former Elle magazine columnist, sued Trump in 2019 over allegedly defamatory statements he made while he was president in which he said she was "not my type" while denying that he raped her in a Manhattan department store dressing room in the mid-1990s.
This past May, Carroll won a related second case accusing Trump of battery and defamation based on a 2022 statement Trump made in which he accused her of lying. Jury members found that Trump did not rape Carroll but sexually abused her, and awarded her a total of $5 million.
MORE: Top 5 moments of E. Jean Carroll's defamation, battery case against Trump
On Wednesday, a judge ruled that -- based on the outcome in the second case -- the next trial, scheduled to begin in January, will only deal with the amount of damages Carroll deserves since the earlier jury already affirmed that Trump did indeed defame her.
"First, it found by a preponderance of the evidence that Mr. Trump sexually abused Ms. Carroll," Judge Lewis Kaplan wrote in Wednesday's ruling. "Second it determined by clear and convincing evidence that Mr. Trump's 2022 statement was false."
"Accordingly, given that the substantive content of Mr. Trump's 2022 statement, which the jury in Carroll II found to be defamatory, is identical to the substantive content of Mr. Trump's 2019 statements, the jury's finding in Carroll II is controlling in this case," the judge wrote.
Trump is appealing the verdict in the earlier case. After New York magazine published Carroll's rape accusation in 2019, Trump denied meeting her, accused her of trying to profit from the claim and said she was trying to carry out a political agenda.
"I say it with great respect: No. 1, she's not my type. No. 2, it never happened. It never happened, OK?" Trump said on June 24, 2019.
Trump argued that any damages awarded in the upcoming trial ought to be limited by the $5 million damage award in the earlier case. The judge rejected that argument, saying, "Mr. Trump's contention thus mixes apples with oranges."
-
US News4m ago
IRS Acts to Address Wide Disparity in Audit Rates Between Black Taxpayers and Other Filers
-
US News4m ago
Viral Emotional Support Alligator Has Gone Missing, Owner Says
-
US News6h ago
Biden Calls Japan and India ‘Xenophobic’ Nations That Do Not Welcome Immigrants
-
US News6h ago
Protesters Are Calling on Universities to Divest from Israel. Here’s What That Means
-
US News12h ago
‘I’m in Menopause!’ Halle Berry Seeks to End a Stigma and Win Funding
-
US News12h ago
Police Begin Dismantling Pro-Palestinian Demonstrators’ Encampment at UCLA
-
US News19h ago
Another Boeing-Linked Whistleblower Has Died: What to Know About Josh Dean and Spirit Aero
-
US News19h ago
Student Journalists From Columbia to UCLA Are on the Frontlines Covering Campus Unrest